Alert : The site is undergoing maintenance. Some functionality including sign-in may be impacted
Saturday, February 21, 6:00 pm through Wednesday, March 04, 12:00 am (EST), 2026
Ordering can continue through fax and phone.
Contact us
Alert : The site is undergoing maintenance. Some functionality including sign-in may be impacted
Saturday, February 21, 6:00 pm through Wednesday, March 04, 12:00 am (EST), 2026
Ordering can continue through fax and phone.
Contact usAlert : The site is undergoing maintenance. Some functionality including sign-in may be impacted
Saturday, February 21, 6:00 pm through Wednesday, March 04, 12:00 am (EST), 2026
.Ordering can continue through fax and phone.
Contact usLooks like you're visiting us from {countryName}. You’re currently on the {originCountryName} site. Do you want to switch to a different country site?
Testing {countryName} {originCountryName}
Improved methods have continually been sought to analyze single-cell cytokine production by human and rodent leukocytes and cell lines. Single-cell cytokine analysis techniques include ELISPOT, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, limiting dilution analysis and single cell PCR. 1 These latter techniques have significant drawbacks requiring either high technical proficiency or tedious data collection and analysis. Flow cytometry is a powerful analytical technique in which individual cells can be simultaneously analyzed for several parameters, including size and granularity, as well as the expression of surface and intracellular markers defined by fluorescent antibodies. 1-5
Recently, fluorescent anti-cytokine and anti-chemokine monoclonal antibodies have become very useful for the intracellular staining and multiparameter flow cytometric analysis of individual cytokine-producing cells within mixed cell populations. 1,3-8 Multicolor immunofluorescent staining with antibodies against intracellular cytokines and cell surface markers provides a high resolution method to identify the nature and frequency of cells which express a particular cytokine(s). For example, multicolor immunofluorescent staining of an individual cell surface antigen and two cytoplasmic cytokines has been used to identify and enumerate cell types which express cytokines in either a restricted ( e.g., Th4- versus Th2-like cells) or unrestricted ( e.g., Th0-like cells) pattern. 9,10 In addition to enabling highly specific and sensitive measurements of several parameters for individual cells simultaneously, this method has the capacity for rapid analysis of large numbers of cells which are required for making statistically significant measurements. 2
Staining of intracellular cytokines depends on the identification of cytokine-specific monoclonal antibodies which are compatible with a fixation-permeabilization procedure. 11-13 Optimal intracellular cytokine staining has been reported using a combination of fixation with paraformaldehyde and subsequent permeabilization of cell membranes with the detergent saponin. Paraformaldehyde fixation allows preservation of cell morphology and intracellular antigenicity, while also enabling the cells to withstand permeabilization by detergent. Membrane permeabilization by saponin allows the cytokine-specific monoclonal antibody to penetrate the cell membrane, cytosol, and membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus.
Critical parameters for cytokine staining include the following: cell type and activation protocol; the time of cell harvest following activation; the inclusion of a protein transport inhibitor during cell activation; and the choice of anti-cytokine antibody.
Various in vitro methods have been reported for stimulating cytokine producing cells. 1,3-15 Polyclonal activators have been particularly useful for inducing and characterizing cytokine-producing cells. These activators include: phorbol esters plus calcium ionophore; phytohemaglutinin; Staphylococcus enterotoxin B; and monoclonal antibodies directed against subunits of the TCR/CD3 complex (with or without antibodies directed against costimulatory receptors such as CD28).
NOTE: It has been reported that cell activation with PMA alone causes a transient loss of CD4 expression from the surface of mouse T cells. Cell activation with PMA and calcium ionophore together has been reported to cause a greater and more sustained decrease in CD4 expression as well as a decrease in CD8 expression in mouse thymocytes and mouse and human peripheral T lymphocytes. 8
BDB-Pharmingen recommends the use of an intracellular protein transport inhibitor during in vitro cell activation for cytokine staining. Use of GolgiStop™ (cat. no. 554724; containing monensin) or GolgiPlug™ (cat. no. 555029; containing brefeldin A) block intracellular transport processes and results in the accumulation of most cytokine proteins in the rough endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi complex. This leads to an enhanced ability to detect cytokine-producing cells. Since these agents have a dose- and time-dependent cytotoxic effect, exposure must be limited.
NOTE: Investigators should be aware of possible effects of transport inhibitors on the expression levels of cell surface markers. Brefeldin A has been found to cause decreased levels of CD14 staining.
Viable activated cell populations can be prepared from in vivo-stimulated tissues or from in vitro-stimulatory cultures. The cells can be suspended and distributed to plastic tubes or microwell plates for immunofluorescent staining. Cells should be protected from light throughout staining and storage.
Reagents that block Fc receptors may be useful for reducing nonspecific immunofluorescent staining. 14
Incubate ~10 6 cells in 50 µl of Staining Buffer (100 µl for staining in tubes) with a pre-titrated optimal concentration (≤0.5 µg) of a fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibody specific for a cell surface antigen, such as, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD14, or CD19 (15-30 min, 4°C). Multicolor staining of different cell surface antigens can be carried out to provide controls for setting proper compensation of the brightest fluorescent signals.
NOTE:Some antibodies which recognize native cell surface markers may not bind to fixed/denatured antigen. For this reason, it is recommended that the staining of cell surface antigens be done with live, unfixed cells PRIOR to fixation/permeabilization and staining of intracellular cytokines.
Altering the procedure such that cells are fixed prior to staining of cell surface antigens requires that suitable antibody clones be empirically identified.
Thoroughly resuspend cells in 100 µl (250 µl for staining in tubes) of Cytofix/Cytoperm™ solution for 10-20 min at 4°C.
NOTE: Cell aggregation can be avoided by vortexing prior to the addition of the Cytofix/Cytoperm™ solution.
Wash cells two times in 1X Perm/Wash™ solution (1 ml/wash for staining in tubes), pellet, and remove supernatant.
NOTE: Perm/Wash ™ solution is required in washing steps to maintain cells in a permeabilized state.
Cells can be fixed and stored to continue the intracellular staining at a later time.
Set PMT voltage and compensation using cell surface staining controls. Set quadrant markers based on blocking controls, isotype controls, or unstained cells.
The frequencies of cytokine-producing cells present in activated human PBMC culture can vary widely due to donor variability. Therefore, cryopreserved cells from a single donor are useful for longitudinal studies. 5,6
For proper flow cytometric analysis, cells stained by this method should be inspected by light microscopy and/or flow light scatter pattern to confirm that they are well dispersed. In order to make statistically significant population frequency measurements, sufficiently large sample sizes should be acquired during flow cytometric analysis. 2 Bivariate dot plots or probability contour plots can be generated upon data reanalysis to display the frequencies of and patterns by which individual cells co-express certain levels of cell surface antigen and intracellular cytokine proteins. 2
The TDS for Pharmingen's fluorochrome-conjugated anti-cytokine antibodies describe in vitro culture systems which can induce detectable frequencies of cytokine-producing cells at specific time-points. Cells stimulated by these methods can be used as positive controls for experimental systems. Published reports of immunofluorescent staining and ELISPOT analysis can also provide useful information regarding different experimental protocols for generating cytokine-producing cells. 1,12,13
To serve as positive controls for intracellular cytokine staining, PharMingen offers sets of activated and fixed leukocyte populations which have been screened for cytokine production.
| Cell Set | Cat. No. | Cytokines Measured |
|---|---|---|
| Human | ||
| HiCK-1 | 555061 | IL-2, IFN- γ, TNF-α |
| HiCK-2 | 555062 | IL-3, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, GM-CSF |
| HiCK-3 | 555063 | IL-1α, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α |
| Mouse | ||
| MiCK-1 | 554652 | IL-2, IFN- γ, TNF-α |
| MiCK-2 | 554653 | IL-3, IL-4, IL-10, GM-CSF |
| MiCK-3 | 554654 | IL-6, IL-12, MCP-1, TNF-α |
| Rat | ||
| RiCK-2 | 555094 | IL-4, IL-10, GM-CSF |
One of the following three controls can be used to discriminate specific staining from artifactual staining. Investigators should choose which staining controls best meet their research needs. Intracellular cytokine staining techniques and the use of blocking controls are described in detail by C. Prussin and D. Metcalfe. 5
Carter, L. L., and S.L. Swain. 1997. Single cell analyses of cytokine production. Curr. Opin. In Immunology. 9:177-182.
Parks, D.R., L.A. Herzenberg, and L.A. Herzenberg. 1989. Flow cytometry and fuorescence-activated cell sorting. In Fundamental Immunology, 2 nd Edition. W.E. Paul, ed. Raven Press Ltd., New York, p. 781-802.
Jung, T., U. Schauer, C. Heusser, C. Neumann and C. Rieger. 1993. Detection of intracellular cytokines by flow cytometery. J. Immunol. Meth. 159:197-207.
Vikingson, A., K. Pederson and D. Muller. 1994. Enumeration of IFN- g producing lymphocytes by flow cytometery and correlation with quantitative measurement of IFN- g. J. Immunol. Meth. 173:219-228.
Prussin, C. and D. Metcalfe. 1995. Detection of intracytoplasmic cytokine using flow cytometry and directly conjugated anti-cytokine antibodies. J. Immunol. Meth. 188:117-128.
Elson, L. H., T.B. Nutman, D. D. Metcalfe and C. Prussin. 1995. Flow cytometric analysis for cytokine production identifies Th4, Th2, and Th0 cells within the human CD4 + CD27 - lymphocyte subpopulation. J. Immunol. 154:4294-4301.
Assenmacher, M., J. Schmitz and A. Radbruch. 1994. Flow cytometric determination of cytokines in activated murine T helper lymphocytes: Expression of interleukin-10 in interferon- g and in interleukin-4-expressing cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1097-1101.
Picker, L. J., M.K. Singh, Z. Zdraveski, J. R. Treer, S. L. Waldrop, P. R. Bergstresser, and V. C. Maino. 1995. Direct demonstration of cytokine synthesis heterogeneity among human memory/effector T cells by flow cytometry. Blood. 86:1408-1419.
Sallusto, F., C. R. Mackay, and A. Lanzavecchia. 1997. Selective expression of the eotaxin receptor CCR3 by human T helper 2 cells. Science. 277:2005-2007.
Austrup, F., D. Vestweber, E. Borges, M. Lohning, R. Brauer, U. Herz, H. Renz, R. Hallmann, A. Radbruch, and A. Hamann. 1997. P- and E-selectin mediate recruitment of T-helper-1 but not T-helper-2 cells into inflamed tissues. Nature. 385:81-83.
Sander, B., J. Andersson and U. Andersson. 1991. Assessment of cytokines by immunofluorescence and the paraformaldehyde-saponin procedure. Immunol. Rev. 119:65-93.
Sander, B., I. Hoiden, U. Andersson, E. Moller, and J. Abrams. 1993. Similar frequencies and kinetics of cytokine producing cells in murine peripheral blood and spleen. J. Immunol. Meth. 166:201-214.
Andersson, U. and J. Andersson. 1994. Immunolabeling of cytokine producing cells in tissues and suspension. In Cytokine Producing Cells, eds. D. Fradelizie and D. Emelie. INSERM, Paris. P. 32-49.
Ferrick, D. A., M. D. Schrenzael, T. Mulvania, B. Hsieh, W. G. Ferlin and H. Lepper. 1995. Differential production of interferon- g and interleukin-4 in reponse to Th4- and Th2-stimulating pathogens by gd T cells in vivo. Nature. 373:255-257.
Sornasse, T., P.V. Larenas, K. A. Davis, J. E. de Vries, and H. Yssel. 1996. Differentiation and stability of T helper 1 and 2 cells derived from naïve human neonatal CD4 + T cells, analyzed at the single cell levels. J. Exp. Med. 184:473-483.
Andersson, S. and C. Coleclough. 1993. Regulation of CD4 and CD8 expression on mouse T cells. J. Immunol. 151:5123-5134.
This form is intended to help us improve our website experience. For other support, please visit our Contact Us page.